Turn sustainability obligations into guided, regulator-ready workflows.

Green Rocket uses onboarding data such as jurisdiction, entity type, organization size, sector, revenue or operating profile, and selected frameworks. For AASB / ASRS S2 workflows, the platform highlights reporting group classification, deadlines, disclosure topics, metrics, and evidence tasks. For PC007 workflows, it can support phase classification and manual override. Final classification should be reviewed by the organization or its advisors before formal reporting.

Yes. Green Rocket is designed around evidence-linked workflows. Teams can upload supporting documents, connect them to compliance sections, track whether evidence is missing or approved, and include evidence references in draft exports. Typical documents include governance policies, board papers, climate risk assessments, utility bills, emissions data, fleet records, travel logs, spreadsheets, and prior reports.

For a pilot, prepare PDFs, spreadsheets, CSV files, Word documents, and source records where available. Structured files such as CSV or Excel are easier to parse for emissions, energy, travel, fleet, and operational data. Scanned PDFs may require OCR or manual review depending on document quality. The best technical setup is to provide one folder of source documents plus a simple index explaining what each file contains.

The AI guidance helps users understand requirements in plain language, identify likely evidence, draft next-step notes, and interpret disclosure sections. It should be treated as workflow assistance. It does not replace legal, audit, assurance, or executive review. Human reviewers should approve final classifications, evidence decisions, and reporting outputs.

Green Rocket is designed to support structured exports such as PDF evidence reports, JSON compliance snapshots, ZIP evidence packs, and tabular review outputs. The platform direction includes XBRL-ready reporting, which means the data model and export structure should support future structured reporting needs. Export readiness depends on how complete the onboarding, evidence, and review workflow is.

Use consistent names, dates, units, and source references. Keep raw source documents separate from summary files. Label files by reporting period and category, such as 2026_energy_bills_q1.pdf or fleet_fuel_log_2026.csv. Assign an internal owner for each evidence category. Green Rocket works best when the upload set has clear filenames, known reporting periods, and a simple explanation of what each file proves.

Yes. Green Rocket supports PC007 as a secondary public-sector workflow for Premier and Cabinet Circular 007, Climate Ready Government. The public website leads with AASB / ASRS S2 climate disclosure workflows first, then presents PC007 as a specialist government solution. PC007 copy can explain phase assignment, timeline generation, governance tasks, climate risk work, emissions planning, evidence collection, and reporting pack preparation. PC007 implementation details should be checked against the official circular and current DPC guidance.

Green Rocket's architecture includes authentication, encrypted sensitive data patterns, document storage, hashed license keys, and role-aware user experiences. The implementation should be reviewed against each customer or agency's security requirements before production use. For pilots, teams should define which documents can be uploaded, who can access them, and whether a sandbox or staging environment is required.

The Green Rocket architecture includes a web application and a desktop app path. The web app supports browser-based workflows, while the desktop path can support native distribution or offline-oriented use cases. The right deployment model depends on security needs, network access, data residency, and whether the team needs local desktop behavior.

A strong implementation team includes an executive sponsor, a compliance or sustainability lead, a technical owner, evidence owners, and a final reviewer. For AASB / ASRS S2, include the people responsible for governance, climate risk, emissions data, finance, risk management, sustainability reporting, and board review. For PC007, include the people responsible for governance, climate risk, emissions data, reporting, and policy interpretation. Green Rocket works best when each compliance section has a named owner and each evidence type has a known source system.

The product architecture is designed to work with databases, document storage, authentication, and reporting exports. Current project context references PostgreSQL, Azure Blob Storage, NextAuth-style authentication, and export generation. Future integrations can include cloud storage, emissions data sources, enterprise identity providers, spreadsheets, document management systems, and reporting pipelines. Specific integrations should be scoped during technical discovery.

Green Rocket shows readiness through completion percentage, missing evidence, open review items, validation warnings, and export state. A draft may be available when core sections are filled and evidence is linked. A final report should require stronger checks: approved sections, resolved gaps, reviewed evidence, confirmed organization details, and sign-off from the responsible team.

Incomplete data becomes visible as gaps, warnings, or open tasks. Green Rocket does not hide missing evidence. The workflow identifies what is missing, which section it affects, who owns it, and what is needed next. The export can include gaps for draft review, while final exports should require the organization to resolve or formally accept remaining gaps.

Technical setup questions route to a pilot or implementation contact form. The form asks for organization type, reporting framework, deployment preference, source systems, expected document volume, security constraints, and target reporting date. This gives the Green Rocket team enough information to recommend onboarding steps, integration scope, and pilot structure.